Sweating ink

Almost as ubiquitous as gloomy talk about the economy is gloomy talk about the demise of newspapers. You can read it in Time Magazine. You can hear it on NPR.

I've spewed my share of electronic words here about the way in which a combination of forces - corporate ownership, financial constraints, an aging readership, competition from electronic media - have pushed newspapers to, and over the brink.

As a c0-founder of a local newsblog (The Middletown Eye), I'm acutely aware of the failure of the legacy media, and the difficult, if not impossible task, of filling the gap with volunteer community journalists.

I bridle at the accusations, hurled by media analysts, that the news can only be delivered by trained journalists, and that the resulting loss of "objectivity," depth and grasp of the "truth" will doom us to a hobbled democracy.

In fact, objectivity and the truth are slippery concepts which reporters and editors have rarely grasped firmly.

Certainly, "untrained" reporters ought to be aware of the difference between reporting news, and opinion. They should understand that checking facts, and having two (ideally three) sources before printing a fact, is the time-honored path to approaching the "truth." They should know that the facts will save them, and having those facts reported accurately in a notebook and on tape are the way to protect them from accusations of inaccuracy, libel and slander. They should know that there are at least two sides to every story. Reporters should be aware that sophisticated sources will try to spin them, and unsophisticated sources may be so lost in a passionate argument that accuracy falls by the wayside.

Unfortunately, if those rules were followed by the legacy media, we might not be in this mess.

The New York Times bought into the administration selling points prior to the Iraq war. The White House Press was cowed into allowing the Bush administration to lie for eight years. Here at home The Hartford Courant the editorial board endorsed Joe Lieberman, John Rowland and Eddie Perez, even as intrepid reporters were working to reveal the vile political manipulations of these politicians. In my hometown, which the Courant has abandoned, the Middletown Press doesn't even have the horses to cover the basic stories.

All this, to point you to one of the best essays I've read recently on the topic.

In a truly thought-provoking Salon essay, Gary Kamiya posits that it's not only the death of newspapers we should worry about, but the death of reporting.

We need to remember that our founding fathers understood the importance of a free press to a well-regulated democracy. At its most desperate juncture, our local state paper, The Hartford Courant, is focusing a microscope on crooked politicians, venal appointees and incompetent corporations.

We can't afford to lose that microscope, even if all it reveals are the viruses which are making our communities sick.

Looks like shit, smells like shit...

There's an old joke from third grade about a boy who steps in a gooey mess in the school yard. His friend says, "You stepped in shit." He says, "No I didn't. It's mud." His friend takes a fingerful of the muck and says, "It looks like shit. It smells like shit." Then he puts his finger in his mouth. "It tastes like shit." And then after considering for a moment, he says, "It is shit."

Joe Klein arrives at the same conclusion in an essay in Time this week. He accurately portrays a media fourth estate so bent on fairness that they miss the point - John McCain is slinging shit.

I never expected the Spanish Inquistion

I've heard of sticking safely to the security of a scripted answer, but I think John McCain's become a bit deranged by a fear that he'll say something he shouldn't (like, "the basics of our economy are strong").

But that obsession seems to have worked against him in a recent interview with Spanish-language Florida television, where McCain seems to equate José Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, who happens to be a Socialist (not such an unusual, or repulsive thing in Europe), with conservative foes like Hugo Chavez.

McCain demonstrates his ability to alienate allies is on a par with George Bush.

BTW, you've got to love Time Magazine's headline: The Pain In Spain Falls Mainly on McCain.

If you stand next to a skunk, you still smell bad when the skunk leaves

I think Creepy Joe™ Lieberman is betting on the wrong polecat. While the Democrats have been grudgingly generous, out of practicality, the feeling is going to change when the Democratic ration increases to 53 or 54 seats, and Ruf Tuf Harry™ Reid is put out to pasture.

Lieberman says he feels "liberated." From what? His responsibility to represent the voters in his home state? From moral obligations? From any sense of loyalty to a party which help build his now-pathetic career?

Remember what ML King said about the arc of justice. Karma's waiting for Joe the second Tuesday in November.